Login

W7-X Divertor Development - Project Team Meeting

→ Europe/Berlin
10.2 SR2 (IPP)

10.2 SR2

IPP
Thierry Kremeyer (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Teilinstitut Greifswald)
Description

https://eu01web.zoom.us/j/91303515504?pwd=eStUUG83c2pXOHMrOEpocXBkVU9nQT09

Thierry Kremeyer
    • 10:00 → 10:10
      General Remarks 10m
      Speaker: Dr Thierry Kremeyer (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Teilinstitut Greifswald)
      2026-10-20_Project_team_update.pptx
      RACI-Matrix_P224.xlsx
    • 10:10 → 10:40
      Pumping plenum optimization 30m
      Speaker: Nikolaus Felder (IPP Bereich Greifswald)
      Particle Removal Optimization.pptx
    • 10:40 → 11:10
      Phase 3: Multi-configuration solutions 30m
      Speaker: Antara Menzel-Barbara (IPP Bereich Greifswald)
      Final_talk2_Menzel_Barbara [Autosaved].pptx
    • 11:10 → 11:30
      OpenSource publishing of Workflow 20m
      Speaker: Dr Thierry Kremeyer (Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Teilinstitut Greifswald)
      1. Unter welcher Open-Source-Lizenz soll der gesamte Workflow veröffentlicht werden? Z. B. Apache 2
      2. Ist vorgesehen, das derzeitige interne Git-Repository unverändert zu veröffentlichen, oder soll für die Veröffentlichung eine gesonderte Release-Version erstellt werden, die ausschließlich die zur Open-Source-Veröffentlichung bestimmten Bestandteile enthält?
      3. One and done? Maintained GIT? Maintainer?

      4. Bobs thoughts:
        1)do you think that the project is currently in a position where it can reliably design good divertor plates according to simple models? I feel like if it's not at that point then basically it's just a case of getting there and showing that the tools work and we understand why.
        2) If it's already at that point, then I think the next step is to write a paper demonstrating this and showing the best results. And then finding someone who can run ECM3-EIRENE to see what our "best divertors" look like with higher-fidelity physics models.
        3) I think the next physics steps require some creative thinking (i.e. there's not an obvious next step because the existing cheap tools are implemented and the expensive tools are too expensive). So either one needs to get a good late stage PhD/postdoc to come up with more ideas, or we just declare "job done" and then it's a tool for physicists/engineers to use
        4) Who is currently managing the open-source workflow?